More Than a Symptom: Understanding Obsessive Structure, Intrusive Thoughts, and OCD
- marcuslewton
- Apr 2
- 4 min read
Introduction: Why Structure Matters
In a busy clinic, it’s easy to focus on symptoms: compulsions, intrusive thoughts, avoidance. Tick the boxes, confirm the diagnosis, assign the intervention.
We need to slow down and ask a different question:
What is the young person’s inner world made of?
Not just what are they doing?
But how are they built, psychically?
This is where the concept of obsessive structure becomes essential. It helps us distinguish between:
• OCD as a diagnosis
• Intrusive thoughts as a symptom
• Obsessive structure as a way of being in the world
Understanding this difference is the key to unlocking real therapeutic movement—especially when standard approaches seem to fall short.
Three Concepts, Three Levels
1. OCD (The Diagnosis)
A 13-year-old boy washes his hands 50 times a day. He avoids touching door handles, won’t eat food unless it’s freshly packaged, and checks the door lock repeatedly.
This meets diagnostic criteria for OCD: time-consuming, distressing, and impairing. ERP and CBT are often the first line of intervention—and may be highly effective.
But a diagnosis doesn’t always tell us how the young person thinks or feels inside. It doesn’t tell us if they have the capacity to symbolise emotion. It doesn’t show us their inner world.
2. Unwanted Intrusive Thoughts (The Symptom)
A 16-year-old girl has a sudden, vivid thought:
“What if I stab my sister with a knife?”
She panics, hides all sharp objects, and avoids her family.
She’s frightened, but open to help. She can talk about feelings. She asks for support.
She has an intrusive thought—but her internal world is flexible. She relates. She reflects. She doesn’t function from an obsessive structure.
Short-term CBT or ERP may resolve her distress. She doesn’t need symbolic restructuring. She just needs containment, a clear frame, and help understanding the thought as ego-dystonic.
3. Obsessive Structure (The System)
A 15-year-old boy doesn’t have overt compulsions. But:
• He mentally reviews every conversation to ensure he wasn’t rude.
• He feels enormous guilt if he doesn’t correct a small error.
• He mistrusts praise.
• He often says, “How can I be sure I’m not a bad person?”
He loops in thought. He asks for reassurance, but discards it instantly. When the therapist offers reflection, he replies: “You have to say that. That’s your job.”
This is obsessive structure. Not just a symptom. Not just anxiety. It’s an entire emotional architecture built around control, guilt, and mistrust of symbolic experience.
Why This Matters in the Clinic
Many young people in clinical settings:
• Don’t meet OCD criteria, but still loop and ruminate obsessively.
• Meet diagnostic criteria, but resist standard treatment.
• Struggle with emotional closeness, symbolic meaning, and trust.
These young people often operate from an obsessive structure—and if we miss it, we risk using the wrong therapeutic language at the wrong time.
Key Markers of Obsessive Structure
1. Thought replaces feeling.
These adolescents talk about emotions, but don’t feel them in the room. They may describe distress in detail while appearing flat or detached.
2. Loops function as emotional containers.
Checking, ruminating, and reassurance-seeking become private systems for holding unbearable affect—especially guilt and shame.
3. The internal critic dominates.
They are judged from within, often relentlessly. They may say:
“I can’t be sure I didn’t enjoy the thought.”
“If I felt better after confessing, maybe I’m manipulating you.”
4. There is a fear of symbolic meaning.
The therapist’s reflections may feel invasive. Meaning itself is dangerous—because meaning links things together, and this young person fears what might emerge if they truly felt.
Clinical Vignette: Two Boys, Same Symptom, Different Structures
Case A: S. (OCD Diagnosis, Flexible Structure)
Age: 14
Symptoms: Fear of contamination; frequent hand washing.
He says: “I know it’s irrational, but I feel disgusting.”
He laughs with the therapist. He accepts help. He shows warmth.
ERP helps. He gradually tolerates more uncertainty. He internalises emotional containment from the therapeutic relationship.
Case B: D. (Obsessive Structure)
Age: 14
Symptoms: Same as above.
He says: “If I don’t wash properly, something bad will happen. I don’t know what.”
He questions the therapist’s motives. He asks for reassurance but then says, “You’re just saying that.”
ERP stalls. Insight doesn’t lead to change. Emotional connection is fragile. Here, symbolic work is essential before behavioural change can occur.
Working with Obsessive Structure: A Symbolic Approach
1. Contain First, Challenge Later
Don’t dismantle the loop until you understand what it holds.
“I wonder if this checking is doing something for you—maybe helping keep a feeling from getting too big?”
2. Speak to the Position
Instead of challenging logic, address the emotional world underneath.
“Maybe part of you wants to believe you’re good—but another part doesn’t trust that anyone would think that.”
3. Work Gently with the Transference
Expect doubt, testing, even hostility. It’s not resistance—it’s survival.
“You’re wondering if I really mean it, or if I’m just saying it because I’m supposed to. That must make it hard to know what to believe.”
4. Use Language to Build Symbolic Capacity
When adolescents loop, they often lack inner words for complex emotion.
We model symbolic language that links feeling, action, and meaning—over time, not all at once.
Conclusion: Different Tools for Different Structures
If we treat every obsessive presentation the same way, we risk missing what the young person truly needs.
• Some need behavioural exposure.
• Some need containment and clarity.
• Some need deep symbolic work before they can tolerate either.
Understanding obsessive structure gives us a map—one that tells us not just where the young person is stuck, but how they learned to survive that way.
And when we see that, we don’t just treat the symptom. We begin to meet the person.
Comments